Hammurabi’s code: was it just Essay

Hammurabi, the king of the small city-state of Babylon, ruled for 42 years make 282 laws being scripted in cuneiform. Together, these 282 laws carved onto a large stone, make up what has come to be cognize as Hammurabis code. Hammurabis code was non just because any(prenominal) of the laws were not only greatly exaggerated towards those accused of crimes, barely also the consequences of the suggested crimes were inequitable and cruel when viewed through the 21st coke place. Hammurabis code is known to have been inscribed into stone in cuneiform.Because laws were most literally written in stone, the laws could never be altered or changed to suit situations or new times better. This is seen as unfair in the 21st degree Celsius perspective because, for example, the United States constitution sack be added onto and laws, or amendments, can and have been, repealed while none of this couldve have been done to Hammurabis code.. (Doc A) even onward though Hammurabis intentions seem to be good by making the intention of the codes to protect the weak from the strong as well as the widows and the orphans, these laws come off a bit harshly (Doc B) .For instance, it is an exaggeration for a married lady to be caught in an affair with another opus and to then be punished by being tied in concert and being drowned (Doc C, Law 129). With the values that the people in the 21st deoxycytidine monophosphate have, this punishment would be perceived as immoral. Rather than being sentenced to remnant by suffocation, fornication can be solved through watchword and forgiveness or by divorce.Another example of these harsh codes would be the excess of cruelty for a sons hand to be cut off for striking his father (Doc C, Law 195). In both 21st century and 4,000 years ago, the sons action is seen as wrong and disrespectful, but the amputation of a sons hand is simply unethical. A more proper upbraiding would be to correct your son through parental discipline, or disown him, or if he is of age, to bring him forth to court.An additional reference to an cannibalic punishment would be the death, or hanging, of a robber in the analogous hole in which he made to break an entering into a home (Doc D, Law 21). An alternative correction to this crime wouldbe for the intruder to be tried in court, and if found guilty of charge, to be sentenced to a fair amount of years for his crime in jail.Although, through the perspective of the 21st century, most of these laws seem unethical, through the perspective of Hammurabi 4,000 years ago, some can be seen as fair or even balance given to the hard realities civilization faced in ancient times. charge if these laws were moral 4,000 years ago, they are not ethical or viewed as just today because the consequences of the crimes are exaggerated and cruel. To be able to shape up prove that these codes were foul, a journal of those who were appointed guilty and punished would be great proof of how unfair these castigation s were.