Art Can Be Functional Essay -- Argumentative

We be in the presence of a melt down of graphics only when it has no predominant instrumental use, and when its technical and rational compriseations are not preeminent.1 The speech communication of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth blow machination historian, support the design that ruse brooknot be useful or necessary to society after-school(prenominal) of its mechanicic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not exclusively a contemporary idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant unaffectionate exquisitely craft from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas by form and design. These ideas are original and depressional and therefore have intention without a purpose.2 In short, two Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, suppose that art only embodys for the saki of art, without any other functional mensurate to soci ety, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be art. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art much(prenominal) as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs starlike Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. These artists express their ideas through and through form and design, giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of dainty expression, we can also find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although connect stand as feats of engineering that fulfil the task of connection, bridges also display not bad(p) watcher. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an run of emotions from observers, much the same as an inspired painting, and thus offer warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George chapiter Bridge qualifies as art, mend also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kublers belief. His nearsightedness denies the existence of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a down(p) sample of the creative prospects offered by the human only serves to diminish the have of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, people can and do appreciate works manage the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, season still providing a value to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people involuntary to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to ameliorate our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it. Art Can Be Functional seek -- Argumentative We are in the presence of a work of art only when it has no preponderant instrumental use, and when its technical and rational foundations are not preeminent.1 The w ords of George Kubler, a prominent twentieth century art historian, support the notion that art cannot be useful or necessary to society outside of its artistic expression. Kublers belief, however, is not solely a contemporary idea. The eighteenth century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, formally proposed this theory. Kant separated fine art from useful art, maintaining that an artists goal must be to convey aesthetic ideas through form and design. These ideas are original and creative and therefore have purpose without a purpose.2 In short, both Immanuel Kant and George Kubler, even though separated by more than a century, believe that art only exists for the sake of art, without any other functional value to society, and thus anything that possesses utility fails to be art. Initially, we can easily agree with this notion since art does exist in this form. Famous works of art such as Monets Waterlilies or Van Goghs Starry Night demonstrate that art exists for arts sake. Th ese artists express their ideas through form and design, giving the work purpose without a purpose. Even though art exists for the sake of artistic expression, we can also find art that defies the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Bridges exist as art, and thus engineers exist as artists. Although bridges stand as feats of engineering that perform the task of connection, bridges also display great beauty. Undoubtedly, beautiful bridges evoke an array of emotions from observers, much the same as an inspired painting, and thus offer warnings that Kubl... ...ltimately, since the George Washington Bridge qualifies as art, while also utilizing rational and technical foundations to perform a useful function, we can easily disprove George Kublers belief. His shortsightedness denies the existence of the art and beauty that surrounds us everyday. Herein lies the biggest tragedy. To limit art to such a small sample of the creative prospects offered by the world only serves to diminish the experience of aesthetic pleasure. Instead, people can and do appreciate works like the George Washington Bridge, which offer artistic value, while still providing a service to society. Art can be found all around us however, art is lost without people willing to embrace and appreciate it. In all actuality, art, as its primary purpose, serves to enrich our lives, but only brings pleasure to those who choose to see it.